Skip to main content

Course Gap Analysis: Improving Access

Course Gap Analysis


I originally started this post with the plan to reflect on course evaluation as I set about to improve my online courses in terms of engagement and completion rates.  However, I came to notice that the majority of the work I was doing was taking existing content and designs and adjusting or revamping. I noticed too that I was doing so in phases.

In particular, I have been working on assessment which in my courses largely means exams, which are a good starting point or foundation for summative and formative assessment opportunities. I observed several stages, the first being improving access.

Improving Access

For exams, I started off working on moving exams and items online. I took book pdfs with the questions and then I converted them to text. From there, I stripped the questions and ran them through a GIFT format converter. I then upload the GIFT files quickly into the Moodle course question banks. I created a text file with an HTML template for formatting resources, such as readings, to be included with individual items as Moodle does not have a function for grouping questions around a single resource. To be organized, I created categories in the question bank to match units and lessons identified in the text. I was not able to assigne items to outcomes so I will have to use an external exam bank tool. I assigned each question an item code using a naming convention. I have tried to do work that could be duplicated by others.

Certainly, this method does not lend itself to widespread use by teachers or developers; however, I was able to quickly put up usable items. Students online have already started completing the entry tests.

Online exam items

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Collaborative Training Course Development System: Introduction

Certainly, you have heard of training, that's the mode of teaching and learning where adults learn what is immediately beneficial for them (and by extension others) in some practical context, such as work, home or play. It aims primarily at improving skills to fill some gap and to meet some prioritized need. To be effective, this training does not occur outside the practical context. It requires regular feedback and reinforcement with supports. Progress needs to be measured, maintained and pushed forward. So when I write that a training course should be developed, you might already see the irony. Courses do not often sit in the practical context. They kind of just happen. Someone receives a paper saying they survived it and have shown skills improvement. Once the course is done, so is the learning and measuring. Certainly, there is no pushing forward. The training course actually seems counter-intuitive to the act of training and its intentions. Equally, if you managed to read ...